What is the best source to review selected court opinions on specific topics and scholarly commentaries?

The best source to review selected court opinions on specific topics and scholarly commentaries is found in legal journals. Legal journals are academic publications that often include analyses of case law, discussions of legal principles, and critiques of courts' decisions. They aim to provide students, practitioners, and scholars with insights and interpretations regarding various legal issues. Journals can also highlight recent developments in law, making them valuable for understanding current trends and scholarly perspectives in the legal field.

Legal journals frequently contain extensive articles that both summarize relevant cases and present scholarly commentary on their implications, making them a rich resource for in-depth legal research. They are peer-reviewed, which adds a level of credibility to the analyses they provide.

Other options may have their own merits; for example, the Restatement of the Law provides summaries of legal principles and topics, but it does not typically include detailed commentary or a comprehensive selection of court opinions. Case briefs summarize individual cases rather than analyze them within a broader context, and ALR provides annotations and a more descriptive summary of case law but is not as comprehensive as legal journals in terms of scholarly commentary. Therefore, legal journals stand out as the most suitable source for both selected court opinions and in-depth legal commentary.