What are court decisions available through court websites inaccurately referred to as?

Court decisions available through court websites are inaccurately referred to as parallel citations. In legal terminology, "parallel citations" typically describe different references to the same judicial opinion found in more than one source, such as both in published case law and in an online database. However, using this term to refer specifically to decisions found on court websites can be misleading, as these decisions may not meet the technical criteria of what constitutes parallel citations.

Thus, while the information might be in the public domain, labeling these decisions as "parallel citations" fails to accurately convey their nature and source. The other options do not have the same confusion associated with them; for instance, primary citations refer to official references in published case law, online resources imply a broad category of information available on the internet, and public domain decisions indicate that the information is available to the public without copyright restrictions. Therefore, the best choice that captures the inaccuracy regarding the characterization of court decisions on official websites is "parallel citations."