Is it true that case law is larger in volume than both constitutional and statutory law?

The assertion that case law is larger in volume than both constitutional and statutory law is grounded in the nature of legal development and the ways that law is created and evolves. Case law, which comprises judicial opinions and legal precedents established by courts, is vast and continually expanding as new cases are decided. Each case adds to the body of legal precedent, addressing a wide array of issues and providing interpretations that can alter or refine existing laws.

In contrast, constitutional law and statutory law do not grow at the same pace. Constitutional laws are often relatively stable, being amended infrequently and subjected to rigorous processes, while statutory laws, although subject to change through legislative action, can be limited in scope compared to the expansive nature of case law. As courts interpret and apply statutory and constitutional provisions through their decisions, they create a body of case law that reflects a broader range of factual scenarios and judicial reasoning.

Thus, when considering the sheer volume of legal material, case law is indeed more extensive, as it encompasses millions of judicial opinions across various levels of courts, often addressing diverse and specific circumstances that arise in practice. This real-time creation of law through case law contributes to its substantial bulk, making it a critical resource for understanding the application and impact of constitutional and statutory provisions